Müller, Peters & Chu reply

Brain size matters: a reply to Peters.

Peters (1993) claimed that published research on brain size and IQ is flawed because it did not meet his list of "minimum conditions" that (a) subjects should be matched for height, weight and age, (b) analyses should be conducted separately within sex, (c) subjects should not vary in prenatal and nutritional history, (d) people with IQS appreciably below the population mean of 100 should not b...

Reply to Peters et al.: Further discussions confirm early Holocene chicken domestication in northern China.

Peters’ Anomaly

While conducting medical aid in Mozambique, a 41 year old African male presented to our eye clinic complaining of visual impairment. The male was found to have Peters' anomaly type 2, a rare congenital ocular malformation leading to sensory amblyopia and glaucoma.

The Authors’ Reply

Reply to the Note by Mr . Aloys Müller , “ On Numbers as Signs ” ( 1923 )

Mr. Aloys Müller’s criticism of the conception of number theory as a theory that deals with meaningless signs (“number signs”) consists basically in three objections. A discussion of these objections is useful for clarifying the standpoint of intuitive number theory, and thereby also that of Hilbert’s proof theory. 1. The first objection is terminological and is directed against the use of the ...